Possibly random than a themed

mostakimvip01

When this time doesn't exist we have to be alert to substitute it. Besides I'm really wary of the commercial world of art. With all these commercial galleries out there I fear that many works are made to be made and sold. I say they are suspicious because some people who know very well what they are doing have found a way and are doing it and naive those who are influenced and follow the stream of suspects. These things do not exist in Greece. We are still in our infancy. But outside all this is very intense. However at the end of the s there was a renunciation of the direct recording of reality and a shift of photographers to the direction and construction of the photographic image. I believe however that what we see lately has no interiority.

There are some extreme cases where the photographs are terribly e-commerce photo editing simplistic and we cannot say that these photographs have interiority whereas the older ones did. I find an Atget photo surprisingly more intimate than these photos. The photograph is always the same directed and the same descriptive. The point is the imaginary world. The fake that comes out of the photo in any case has mystery and tension. How one makes it is immaterial. You believe that photography has as its starting point the real but no art acquires importance and quality if it expresses the real.

  

What we ask of her is its transcendence its transformation and from there our transition to the realm of the spiritual. How do you think this breakthrough can be achieved How do we move from a photographic image to the realm of the spiritual That's exactly what concerns me. It is impossible to answer. The most important thing is to understand the question. Why do you think photo portfolios detract from a photographer's work Isn't a good photo easier and set of photos The section is most often presented as a section of an illustrated subject.