Explain his turn to directing photography

mostakimvip08

Robert Frank's post efforts in photography are image pioneers. However the few pictures he has taken since then are very cinematic. They are very interesting they couldn't be bad because they have the stamp of a genius on them. But we don't have a complete project. What I think is bad is treating The Americans as a journalistic work and what he did later as artistic. After all what decisive moment means according to Bresson needs a lot of analysis. And it's not what most people realize anyway. There is a even in the socalled directed. But how do you There are many artists who have changed paths Robert Frank is not the first.

Many artists face dead ends in their way of expression. And they change e-commerce photo editing completely afterwards. That doesn't diminish them. For me Henri CartierBresson would not be a great artist if it were not for the period  when he was young. There are artists who have short bursts and artists who are driven after many years of work to the peak. However it is very dangerous to generalize and this is something that often happens when you teach. Every time I see a student taking notes on something I say I cringe. As I point out certain elements in an image that I like I feel that I am wrong.

  

I honestly prefer my students not to understand. I would like to show them photos and have them accept them out of trust in me as a teacher. Let them mature inside them and then understand them. I did not immediately understand Atget. Why should I expect a child to accept him immediately The bad thing is to try to explain it to him instead of leaving him alone in creative contact with it. I always say my opinion without investing it with any science. I'm just giving some direction. We have to explain certain things but at the same time give a freedom. You do not know how much the young man needs to understand immediately.