The second when the already

mostakimvip04

Equally logical that those who chose on the scale of their own hierarchy to talk about their photography and to display and promote it at the risk of creating a good name and a good reputation are not anymore such good photographers. but then to discover that they no longer have anything to sell. Photography easy to apply humble in its origins but multifaceted and contradictory in its approaches suffers more than any other art form the pressure of the search for identity and the establishment of hierarchies. Some answers may be found in the above two phrases of Van Gogh.Art needs criticism. Criticism that helps the artist see his work from the outside in. The criticism that helps the viewer approach the work.

Criticism that gives rise to discussion questioning revision e-commerce photo editing question marks. However in order for criticism to work correctly a relationship of trust and appreciation is required. From the student to the teacherjudge. From the viewer to the theoreticianjudge. From the artist to his peerjudge. From friend to friendjudge. The good intention and sincerity of the judge are also assumed. Finally a minimum level of consensus between the judge and the recipient is assumed on basic principles values ​​and priorities of both art and life. If any of these are absent the criticism in the simplest case falls into the void. Criticism can be done in two ways. Live or impersonal. In the first case the critic addresses the recipient through life and their eyes communicate in imprinted speech intervenes the criticism is a blind message a bottle in the waves.

  

The first is blessed. The second ungrateful. Both possibly necessary and probably useful. The recipient of criticism whether the creator himself or the viewer commits a great mistake when he looks for a reviewer who agrees with his work or his views in advance. Such a narcissistic approach satisfies the ego but does not promote critical thinking. He also makes mistakes when arguing with the judge. This act is competitive and not constructive. You either discuss with the judge or you withdraw. Otherwise the scheme is distorted because we simultaneously have two critical intentions that negate each other. The judge commits a great error if he wants to be liked. It's his own narcissistic side.